R. v. X.X. – 2025 – 7841
Allegation:
X.X. was charged with assaulting a peace officer after an altercation on 17th Avenue SW during bar close hours in Calgary. The incident began when members of the Calgary Police Gang Suppression Team (GST) entered a licensed venue on Red Mile to conduct what they call “compliance and suppression checks.” These are routine but high-discretion operations authorized under Alberta’s Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Act, section 69.1. The Gang Suppression Team has broad authority under this legislation to eject or bar individuals from licensed premises based solely on a belief—formed in good faith—that a person is associated with a gang.
Crucially, no actual criminal activity is required. No conviction. No formal allegation. Just a belief that someone is associated with a gang—or simply in the company of someone who is. Officers may rely on second-hand information or general observations like clothing, tattoos, social group, or past contact with police. The law specifically says no warning, hearing, or review process is required. If someone refuses to leave after being ejected, they immediately become a trespasser under provincial law.
In this case, officers approached X.X. and his group inside the bar and ordered them to leave under section 69.1, asserting that they were “associated with gang members.” X.X. responded with frustration, questioning the basis for the removal. According to police, X.X. became loud and confrontational, refused to leave, and was escorted out by multiple officers. Outside, the tension escalated. Police alleged that X.X. resisted, swore at officers, and ultimately spit toward one of them during the physical interaction.
Spitting on an officer is treated as a highly aggravating act of violence in Canadian courts. Although it may not cause physical injury, it is often viewed as humiliating, degrading, and deeply disrespectful. Sentencing courts routinely describe it as a form of biological assault. Even first-time offenders frequently face jail if convicted of spitting on a peace officer. Combined with alleged resistance and gang-association claims, this was a very serious charge with real custodial risk.
Legal Context – Section 69.1 of the GLC Act
Under Alberta law, the Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Act gives police extensive authority in licensed spaces. Section 69.1 allows any officer to remove or exclude a person from a bar, lounge, or nightclub if they believe the person is associated with a gang. No proof is required. No formal process exists to challenge the decision. The Act defines “association” broadly—someone who is present with a gang member, supports them, or is simply perceived to be part of their circle can be ejected.
Information used to form this belief can include tattoos, clothing, second-hand intelligence, prior police interactions, or even alleged sightings at other incidents. Once a person is directed to leave, refusal to comply results in immediate trespass charges—even if the person has done nothing illegal. Police often use this tool to justify ejections and detentions in high-traffic areas like 17th Avenue SW, especially during Stampede or Friday/Saturday nightlife.
Result:
Win. All charges withdrawn. withdrew all charges.
In a case where jail was not only possible but expected, X.X. walked away without a criminal record. The case highlights how rapidly a night out can become a high-risk legal situation—particularly when the Gang Suppression Team and unchecked statutory authority intersect.
Have You Been Evicted by the Gang Suppression Team?
Our office regularly hears from individuals who’ve been removed from bars or nightclubs by the Calgary Police Gang Suppression Team—often without explanation, without any criminal charge, and without any real opportunity to respond. People want to know: What can I do? What’s my remedy? Unfortunately, the answer is: not much.
Under section 69.1 of Alberta’s Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Act, police can eject anyone they believe is “associated with a gang.” No evidence is required. No hearing. No review. Unless you’re actually charged with an offence, there’s no practical way to challenge the ejection.
If you are charged—whether with trespass, assault, obstruction, or resisting arrest—we can challenge the legality and constitutionality of the police action as part of your defence. Otherwise, your only other option is to pursue a constitutional challenge to the legislation itself—something that could take years and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.